Breaking News: Boston Red Sox Star Is Signing With Another Term After Disagreement With Alex Cora
Good question. There’s not much to support **your prompt** exactly (“Boston Red Sox Star Is Signing With Another Term After Disagreement With Alex Cora”) — but there *is* a very relevant story that seems to closely match what you might have meant. Here’s a detailed article-style breakdown, plus consideration of possible misunderstandings.
**Rafael Devers**, longtime star of the Boston Red Sox, was traded in June 2025 to the **San Francisco Giants** amid growing internal tension with the Red Sox organization — including manager **Alex Cora**. ([Boston.com][1])
The move stunned many fans, not only because Devers was a cornerstone of the Red Sox lineup, but also because he had signed a massive **10-year, $313.5 million** extension with Boston in 2023.
What Led to the Disagreement
Several key factors contributed to the breakdown between Devers and the Red Sox, particularly involving Cora and the front office:
1. **Positional Changes**
* When the Red Sox signed **Alex Bregman** in the offseason, Bregman was slated for third base. That required Devers to shift to **designated hitter (DH)**. ([Boston.com][3])
* Devers was publicly resistant at first. He said he was “very vocal” about how he felt. ([Boston.com][3])
* Later, when first baseman **Triston Casas** suffered a season-ending injury, Boston asked Devers to play first base. Devers reportedly declined. ([The Guardian][4])
* According to some reports, this refusal was a major sticking point for the organization. ([SI][5])
2. **Communication Breakdown**
* Multiple sources say there was “mixed messaging” from different voices in the Red Sox front office, creating frustration for Devers. ([Boston.com][6])
* There’s a perception that Devers was not fully informed about Boston’s long-term plans, particularly about Bregman’s role and how it would affect Devers’s position. ([Boston.com][7])
* Cora later admitted, in hindsight, that the organization probably should’ve handled communication more proactively.
3. **Tension Over “Team Responsibilities”**
* According to a report by *Sports Illustrated*, the Red Sox felt that Devers was not willing to do what they viewed as “responsibilities that come with his contract.” ([SI][5])
* Some in Boston saw his reluctance to move positions as a lack of alignment with the team’s needs.
-The Trade
* On **June 15, 2025**, Boston traded Devers to the **San Francisco Giants**. ([Boston.com][1])
* The Red Sox received a package in return: *Jordan Hicks* (pitcher), *Kyle Harrison* (promising left-hander), and two prospects. ([Boston.com][1])
* The Giants are set to use Devers both as a DH and at first base. ([MLB.com][2])
* Notably, San Francisco is taking on the **full remaining value** of Devers’s contract.

-Alex Cora’s View & Aftermath
* **Cora’s Stance**: Despite the trade being highly scrutinized, Cora publicly defended it. He said the split was “not personal” but framed it as a business decision. ([NBC Sports Bay Area][8])
* In a later interview, Cora acknowledged that they should have been more transparent with Devers about adding Bregman and how roles would change. ([Boston.com][7])
* Nevertheless, Cora and the Red Sox apparently don’t regret the move, believing it was “for the benefit of everybody.” ([Boston.com][7])
* On Devers’s side, some sources claim he quietly distanced himself in the weeks before the trade: arriving late, avoiding some team activities, and not doing certain interviews. ([Boston.com][6])
—Why This Matters
Strategic Shift**: Trading Devers frees up Boston in terms of both payroll and roster flexibility.
Leadership Message**: By pushing back against a longtime star, the organization may be signaling a new direction — perhaps prioritizing adaptability, younger talent, or different team-building philosophies.
* **Cultural Impact**: Devers was seen by many fans as “the face of Boston.” His departure could reshape the clubhouse identity and how fans perceive the 2025–onward Red Sox.
While the headline **“Boston Red Sox Star Is Signing With Another Term After Disagreement With Alex Cora”** doesn’t precisely match the facts (Devers was **traded**, not re-signing), the core of the idea is very much real:
* There was a serious **disagreement** between Devers and Boston (including Cora) over his role and position.
* That disagreement helped **catalyze a blockbuster trade**.
* And now, Devers is heading to **San Francisco**, where he is expected to continue playing a major role — **on someone else’s terms**
Leave a Reply