Stay or Leave: Reds Make Bold Move After $115.5M Catcher Deal
**CINCINNATI —**
In the wake of a record‐setting $115.5 million contract deal for a premier catcher elsewhere, the Cincinnati Reds have initiated a bold gambit to stabilize their own catching corps. With internal debates swirling over who should stay and who should depart, the club appears ready to pull the trigger on a high‑stakes move to shore up both their defense and long-term positioning behind the plate.
### The $115.5M Benchmark That Raised the Bar
Back in January 2021, the Philadelphia Phillies re‑signed J.T. Realmuto to a five-year, $115.5 million deal, setting a new standard for catcher compensation in Major League Baseball. ([ESPN.com][1]) Realmuto’s pact carried an average annual value of $23.1 million, making it the highest AAV for a catcher at that time. ([ESPN.com][1])
That landmark contract helped recalibrate how franchises view the dual value of catchers: not just as defensive anchors, pitch-callers, and framing specialists, but as premium players deserving of elite pay. In that environment, any team seeking to compete must either build around such elite backstops or risk falling behind.
For Cincinnati, Realmuto’s deal — and subsequent high catcher contracts (such as Cal Raleigh’s six-year, $105 million extension with Seattle) ([FOX Sports][2]) — drove home the urgency: investing in the position is no longer optional.
### Reds’ Catcher Turmoil: Who’s Staying, Who’s Going?
Catcher has been a point of instability for the Reds in recent seasons. With Tyler Stephenson, Luke Maile, and prospects in the mix, the organization has struggled to settle on a clear long-term answer.
In December 2024, Cincinnati traded reliever Fernando Cruz to the Yankees to acquire **Jose Trevino** (formerly of New York) in a swap involving catcher Alex Jackson. ([Red Reporter][3]) That move was widely perceived as a push to strengthen the catching depth chart.
Then, in March 2025, the Reds inked Trevino to a three-year extension worth approximately $15 million (with club option for 2028), including $11.5 million in newly guaranteed money. ([ESPN.com][4]) That ensured the veteran backstop would remain part of the core, at least through 2027. ([ESPN.com][4])
Yet, despite that security, questions persisted: should Stephenson be traded, retained as a backup, or phased out? ([Reddit][5]) Some insiders and fan voices have leaned toward moving Stephenson while Trevino becomes the primary, citing Trevino’s framing and veteran presence. ([Reddit][6]) Others caution about losing a young asset who still carries upside and club control.
So the question emerges: **Stay or Leave**?
* **Stay:** Keep Trevino as the primary catcher, move Stephenson into a reduced role or package him in a trade before his arbitration years push his value higher.
* **Leave:** Cut bait on Trevino (or let him walk after 2027) and bet on internal catching options or prospects to fill the void.
### The Latest Move: A Star Catcher in the Crosshairs?
Amid this uncertainty, Reds management is reportedly making fresh overtures toward a *star catcher* to complement or even supplant their current options. Though no confirmed name has emerged publicly at the time of writing, the timing suggests they may take inspiration from rival contracts like Realmuto’s and Raleigh’s, and aim to land a top-tier backstop before the offseason arms race hits full swing.
Several strategic rationales could underpin such a move:
* **Defensive stability and pitcher comfort** — pitchers often demand consistency in pitch-calling and framing; bringing in an experienced star can boost staff confidence.
* **Roster flexibility** — if the new catcher is locked in long-term, existing catchers (e.g. Stephenson) become tradeable assets.
* **Signaling intention** — a splash move sends a message to fans and rival front offices that Cincinnati intends to compete now, not rebuild indefinitely.
Naturally, any acquisition would come with bold financial implications, especially in a market already benchmarked by the $115.5M contract. The Reds would have to evaulate whether the acquisition aligns with their payroll philosophy and whether they can absorb it alongside long-term deals to other core players.
### Risks, Rewards & What to Watch
#### Risks
* **Overpaying** — securing a high-end catcher can become a burden if offensive or defensive decline arrives early.
* **Locking out internal options** — if a veteran star occupies the spot, prospects or existing catchers may become blocked, diminishing organizational depth.
* **Injury** — catchers age fast, and injuries are common. A long-term contract carries risk.
#### Rewards
* **Upgrade at a premium position** — catching is one of the hardest roster spots to fill; owning it can confer a durable edge.
* **Improved pitching performance** — better pitch framing and game management can yield real run prevention across a pitching staff.
* **Trade leverage** — excess or displaced catching value can be moved as trade chips.
#### What to Watch
1. **Contract terms** — length, guarantees, club/vested options, deferred money all matter.
2. **Who is displaced** — does Trevino stay? What happens to Stephenson?
3. **Cap and payroll flexibility** — can the Reds fit that contract into their broader roster construction?
4. **Fan reaction and optics** — a big move can energize the fan base, but only if it feels well-conceived.
### Final Take
Cincinnati finds itself at a crossroads in the catching landscape. The landmark $115.5 million contract that once redefined the value of elite backstops is now influencing front offices across MLB — and the Reds are no exception. By extending Trevino and keeping Stephenson in the mix, they’ve secured continuity, but not clarity. The rumored approach toward a star catcher signals willingness to force resolution, not let the status quo linger.
Will they double down and commit to a premium option — or stand pat and live with internal uncertainty? That “Stay or Leave” question might define the Reds’ competitive posture for years to come.
Leave a Reply